Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
By: S.J. Steinhardt
Published Date: Mar 4, 2024
As companies continue to make financial reporting mistakes this earnings season, resulting in restatements, some professionals point to the shor
By: S.J. Steinhardt
Published Date: Mar 4, 2024
As companies continue to make financial reporting mistakes this earnings season, resulting in restatements, some professionals point to the shortage of CPAs as a possible partial cause, Accounting Today reported. It mentioned that, as Bloomberg reported, several major companies had to correct their quarterly earnings statements recently, including Lyft Inc. and Planet Fitness Inc.
As retirements outpace the infusion of new practitioners entering the profession, the result is an increase in current accountants' hours and workloads, increasing the potential for mistakes and burnout.
"If the people preparing the financials are overworked, or there's not enough of them, you will have errors," said Joshua Khavis, assistant professor of accounting and law at the University at Buffalo School of Management, whose research has documented links among auditor turnover, long working hours and mistakes.
Last year, more than 720 companies cited insufficient staff in accounting and other departments as a reason for potential errors, an increase of 30 percent from 2019, according to an analysis by equity research firm Hudson Labs for Bloomberg News.
Experts have cited several reasons for the shortage. For example, Guylaine Saint Juste, the president and CEO of the National Association of Black Accountants, Inc. (NABA), wrote in Fortune that the 150-hour rule has become "a structural barrier that many believe, and recent research supports, makes it difficult to attract skilled talent." Student debt loads and low pay, compared to that of other fields that attract those with accounting skills, are additional problems.
“I would attribute a large portion of that national decline in accounting enrollments to the general reluctance of public accounting firms to significantly increase starting salaries,” said Michael Donohoe, head of the accounting department at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, who previously worked at PwC, in an interview with The Wall Street Journal last year. “Over the last eight to 10 years, starting salaries have not kept pace with these really cool emerging fields, like data science.”
Jacqueline Burke, a professor of accounting at Hofstra University's Zarb School of Business, told Accounting Today that the demand for fresh talent has become so intense that more firms are turning to undergraduates to bridge gaps, leading to many students taking on full-time internships on top of their full-time studies. "The number of students doing that—it's unheard of," she said.
Companies are intervening to help ease the path to certification, such as PwC’s pilot program with Saint Peter's University in New Jersey that allows students to count full-time, paid work at the firm toward their credit hours. Other companies emphasize the positive social impact accountants can make when posting jobs; listings that do so draw 80 percent more applications, on average, according to Handshake.
For some, the problem still remains the 150-hour rule.
"You're talking about the opportunity cost of working full-time for a year and the cost of tuition," said Ralph Polimeni, an accounting professor at Hofstra University. "If I were entering now into [a] profession, I don't think I would've gone into accounting."
May/June 2024, Featured, News & Views, Taxation | August 2024
https://www.cpajournal.com/2024/08/16/first-look-at-new-york-states-llc-transparency-act/
On December 22, 2023, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed the LLC Transparency Act as Chapter 772 of the Laws of 2023. The act is modeled on the federal Corpor
May/June 2024, Featured, News & Views, Taxation | August 2024
https://www.cpajournal.com/2024/08/16/first-look-at-new-york-states-llc-transparency-act/
On December 22, 2023, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed the LLC Transparency Act as Chapter 772 of the Laws of 2023. The act is modeled on the federal Corporate Transparency Act, which requires the disclosure of the identities of beneficial owners upon a company’s formation or registration, and the publishing of beneficial owners’ names to the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
Although the federal act covers corporations, LLPs, or any other entity created by the filing of a document with the secretary of state or any similar office under the law of a state or Indian tribe, the New York act only applies to LLCs.
The New York act attempts to end the practice of anonymous ownership of limited liability companies (LLC) in New York.
The state act adopts the same standards as the federal act and requires that the same information also be filed with New York’s Department of State. Companies subject to the federal government’s reporting requirements may submit a copy of their federal registration to New York’s Department of State in order to minimize the burden of such reporting. To protect the genuine privacy interests that some individuals may have, a waiver process has been created, with specific protections for whistleblowers using LLCs to file false claims act lawsuits, as well as individuals participating in a witness protection program and an address confidentiality program.
Although the federal Corporate Transparency Act took effect on January 1, 2024, the New York LLC Transparency Act will take effect on December 21, 2024; all LLCs organized prior to January 1,2026, must file an initial report before January 1, 2026. Covered Entities and Exempt Entities formed or registered to do business in the State of New York after January 1, 2026 must file an initial disclosure or attestation of exemption, respectively, with the Department within 30 days of the filing of such Covered Entity’s or Exempt Entity’s articles of organization or application for authority to do business within the State of New York, as applicable.
(Editor’s Note: As originally published in print, the article erroneously stated in the above paragraph that at all all LLCs organized prior to December 21, 2024, must file an initial report by January 1, 2025.)
The state act requires that all LLCs and foreign LLCs must include a list of beneficial owners with the documents submitted to the Department of State when organizing an LLC in New York State. Exempt companies, as defined in the federal act, must indicate which exemptions they are claiming against their obligation to file an initial report.
A beneficial owner is defined as, with respect to an LLC, an individual who, directly or indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, understanding, relationship, or otherwise:
The initial report of a reporting company must include the following information:
The initial report must also include the following information for every individual who is a beneficial owner of that reporting company, as well as every individual who is a company applicant with respect to that reporting company:
If a reporting company makes any change in the information initially required to be disclosed as described above, or if a reporting company has not filed the required disclosure, that company must file such disclosure when filing its certificate of amendment.
Although the New York LLC Transparency Act originally required the secretary to maintain a publicly available database on its website for each business entity organized in New York state and each foreign business entity with authority to do business in the state, the governor signed a compromise bill eliminating the requirement to create a publicly available database.
There has been discussion as to whether CPAs should take on the responsibility of filing the required information with the appropriate federal and state authorities, or whether these filings are best done by attorneys or the various companies that provide articles of incorporation or articles of organization.
On March 1, 2024, a Federal Court in Alabama ruled that the federal Corporate Transparency Act is unconstitutional, holding that Congress exceeded its taxing powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause as enumerated in Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution. This decision will almost certainly be appealed. In the author’s opinion, this only adds more confusion and uncertainty as to whether the New York LLC Transparency Act will be affected by this federal court decision. CPAs should consult with an attorney before proceeding with filing the above required documents under the state act.
On July 9, 2024, the Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law of the Supreme Court of New Jersey issues an opinion letter regarding whether the filing of beneficial owner information reports under the federal Corporate Transparency Act constitutes the unauthorized practice of law in New Jersey.
The opinion letter states that “a licensed CPA can engage in this conduct provided the CPA notifies the client that it may be advisable to consult with a lawyer. The Committee relies on the professionalism of CPAs to ensure that such licensees will recognize when a filing is more complex and it is in the client’s interests for a lawyer to be retained in the matter.
“Given that most filings are likely to be straightforward, the Committee finds that a licensed CPA can engage in this conduct provided the CPA notifies the client that it may be advisable to consult with a lawyer. The Committee relies on the professionalism of CPAs to ensure that such licensees will recognize when a filing is more complex and it is in the client’s interests for a lawyer to be retained in the matter.
“While small businesses are now faced with retaining a lawyer or a CPA (or Enrolled Agent) to submit such reports, the businesses with straightforward filings should be able to do the task themselves, with guidance from FinCEN, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and other entities Corporations may file the forms on their own, but if they hire someone to do it on their behalf, it must be a lawyer or a CPA/Enrolled Agent.
“Since the Act is new and circumstances may change, the Committee reserves the right to amend or supplement this response in the future. The consideration of the public interest may be affected by the pending Eleventh Circuit case from Alabama and other court actions that may be filed, in New Jersey or elsewhere, regarding compliance with this new Act. Should those developments — or other information that may arise — affect the Committee’s analysis, it may reconsider this response”.
While this opinion letter appears to provide some relief to CPAs, it allows the Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law of the Supreme Court of New Jersey to reverse its opinion in the future.
Mark H. Levin, CPA, MST own account, is a member of The CPA Journal Editorial Advisory Board.
By: Karen Sibayan
Published Date: Sep 11, 2024
On Sept. 9, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)’s new quality control standard and related
By: Karen Sibayan
Published Date: Sep 11, 2024
On Sept. 9, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)’s new quality control standard and related changes to its standards, rules, and forms. In the release, the SEC said that QC 1000, titled A Firm’s System of Quality Control, creates an integrated and risk-based quality control standard. This standard mandates that all registered public accounting firms identify the specific risks to their practice while designing a quality control system with appropriate responses to avoid those risks.
“An auditing firm is ultimately a professional services firm, and it needs to ensure the quality of the services it provides,” said SEC Chair Gary Gensler. “I am pleased to approve this standard because it will improve the quality control systems of auditors and thus better protect investors.”
In the statement, the SEC mentioned that the current PCAOB quality control standards were developed about 30 years ago by the AICPA—way before the accounting fraud scandals that happened in the early 2000s that caused the PCAOB’s establishment under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
QC 1000 is an answer to the shifts in the audit practice environment since then. The response also leverages what the PCAOB has learned in the 20 years of conducting inspections and enforcement programs.
“Effective QC systems provide critical investor protections by driving continuous improvement in firms’ audit quality in support of the issuance of informative, accurate, and independent audit reports,” said Paul Munter, the SEC’s chief accountant.
According to the SEC, registered firms that perform engagements under PCAOB standards must implement and operate the QC system. The new quality control standard zeroes in on an audit firm’s accountability. It also improves its audit practice and requires a yearly evaluation of its QC system and related reporting to the PCAOB, certified by key firm personnel.
The SEC release said that firms that issue audit reports for over 100 issuers must also establish an external quality control function comprising one or more persons who can exercise independent judgment related to the firm’s QC system.
Despite the approval, Commissioner Hester Pierce released a statement saying that the standard will pose many considerable challenges when it is implemented. Among the various concerns that stand out, one of them is that, even though many registered firms do not perform audits of issuers or broker-dealers, all registered firms are required to design a quality control system that complies with QC 1000.
Commissioner Mark Uyeda also chimed in, saying that during the initial 90-day period of the standard, many commenters were worried that the PCAOB had not given the public the chance to consider the requirement for certain firms to adopt and implement an external quality control function in its rulemaking process. He added that the final requirement "was not a logical outgrowth from the Board’s proposal."
By: Karen Sibayan
Published Date: Sep 11, 2024
On Sept. 9, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)’s new quality control standard and related
By: Karen Sibayan
Published Date: Sep 11, 2024
On Sept. 9, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)’s new quality control standard and related changes to its standards, rules, and forms. In the release, the SEC said that QC 1000, titled A Firm’s System of Quality Control, creates an integrated and risk-based quality control standard. This standard mandates that all registered public accounting firms identify the specific risks to their practice while designing a quality control system with appropriate responses to avoid those risks.
“An auditing firm is ultimately a professional services firm, and it needs to ensure the quality of the services it provides,” said SEC Chair Gary Gensler. “I am pleased to approve this standard because it will improve the quality control systems of auditors and thus better protect investors.”
In the statement, the SEC mentioned that the current PCAOB quality control standards were developed about 30 years ago by the AICPA—way before the accounting fraud scandals that happened in the early 2000s that caused the PCAOB’s establishment under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
QC 1000 is an answer to the shifts in the audit practice environment since then. The response also leverages what the PCAOB has learned in the 20 years of conducting inspections and enforcement programs.
“Effective QC systems provide critical investor protections by driving continuous improvement in firms’ audit quality in support of the issuance of informative, accurate, and independent audit reports,” said Paul Munter, the SEC’s chief accountant.
According to the SEC, registered firms that perform engagements under PCAOB standards must implement and operate the QC system. The new quality control standard zeroes in on an audit firm’s accountability. It also improves its audit practice and requires a yearly evaluation of its QC system and related reporting to the PCAOB, certified by key firm personnel.
The SEC release said that firms that issue audit reports for over 100 issuers must also establish an external quality control function comprising one or more persons who can exercise independent judgment related to the firm’s QC system.
Despite the approval, Commissioner Hester Pierce released a statement saying that the standard will pose many considerable challenges when it is implemented. Among the various concerns that stand out, one of them is that, even though many registered firms do not perform audits of issuers or broker-dealers, all registered firms are required to design a quality control system that complies with QC 1000.
Commissioner Mark Uyeda also chimed in, saying that during the initial 90-day period of the standard, many commenters were worried that the PCAOB had not given the public the chance to consider the requirement for certain firms to adopt and implement an external quality control function in its rulemaking process. He added that the final requirement "was not a logical outgrowth from the Board’s proposal."
Roma Financial Services
Copyright © 2025 Roma Financial Services - All Rights Reserved.
Powered by GoDaddy
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.